For this assignment, you will revisit The Case of Marie you will assess the needs of all relevant family members and work out treatment goals that will best provide a positive outcome for the entire family.

Overview

For this assignment, you will revisit The Case of Marie you will assess the needs of all relevant family members and work out treatment goals that will best provide a positive outcome for the entire family. Use your previous assignment as a starting point; you can use resources used for that assignment as reference where relevant, as well as course readings, discussions, and material from the Capella University Library.

You will review a media activity to help you complete this assignment.

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following competencies and behaviors:

CSWE-BOA EPAS Competency 1: Demonstrate ethical and professional behavior.
- C1.GP.A: Make ethical decisions by applying the standards of the National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics, relevant laws and regulations, models for ethical decision-making, ethical conduct of research, and additional codes of ethics within the profession as appropriate to the context.
  - Related assignment criterion:
    - 5. Apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions that may arise within this case study.
CSWE-BOA EPAS Competency 3: Engage Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ADEI) in Practice.
- C3.GP.A: Demonstrate anti-racist and anti-oppressive social work practice at the individual, family, group, organizational, community, research, and policy levels.
  - Related assignment criterion:
    - 3. Identify at least two community resources to recommend for the family.
CSWE-BOA EPAS Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C6.GP.A: Apply knowledge of human behavior and person-in-environment, as well as interprofessional conceptual frameworks, to engage with clients and constituencies.
  - Related assignment criterion:
    - 1. Identify two client needs and two goals.
- C6.GP.B: Use empathy, reflection, and interpersonal skills to engage in culturally responsive practice with clients and constituencies.
  - Related assignment criterion:
    - 4. Explain any foreseen areas of difficulty this family may have in moving forward with the treatment goals.
CSWE-BOA EPAS Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities.
- C7.GP.A: Apply theories of human behavior and person-in-environment, as well as other culturally responsive and interprofessional conceptual frameworks, when assessing clients and constituencies.
  - Related assignment criterion:
    - 2. Identify two objectives for each treatment goal based on the assessment.

Preparation

To prepare for this assignment, familiarize yourself with the following helpful resources:

Instructions

For this assignment, you will review the media activity to help you create a family intervention plan based on your previous assessment and evaluation of the client.

Using the Family Treatment Plan media activity, complete the following prompts:

PART 1: Create a family intervention plan based on your previous assessment and evaluation of the client. Use your knowledge of human behavior and the social environment to create a written intervention plan using client strengths, resources, and problem areas. Utilize the knowledge needed to understand the person in the environment as it applies to this family.

Identify two client needs and two goals. (C6.GP.A)
- State the goals in a SMART format.
Identify two objectives for each treatment goal based on the assessment. (C7.GP.A)
- Apply evidence-based research to inform practice interventions.

PART 2: Recommend resources and explain your reasoning.

Identify at least two community resources to recommend for the family. (C3.GP.A)
- Provide a rationale for the resources and links to the resources.

PART 3: Reflect on how the ethical dilemma could impact the implementation of the intervention plan with the family and describe the strategies you would use to minimize negative outcomes.

Explain any foreseen areas of difficulty this family may have in moving forward with the treatment goals. (C6.GP.B)
- Explain how you would manage these areas.
Apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions that may arise within this case study. (C1.GP.A)
- Explain how to tolerate ambiguity when resolving ethical conflicts.

Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.

Adhere to the rules of grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
Apply current APA style standards, including paper format, in-text citations, and the references list.

Additional Requirements

Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:

Written communication: Written communication should be scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
APA formatting: Resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards. Use Academic WriterLinks to an external site. for guidance in citing sources in proper APA style. See the Writing CenterLinks to an external site. for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
Number of resources: A minimum of five scholarly sources, in addition to any relevant sources from the Week 6 assignment. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

View RubricFamily Treatment PlanFamily Treatment PlanCriteriaRatingsPtsIdentify two client needs and two goals. (C6.GP.A)32 to >27.2 ptsDISTINGUISHEDIdentifies two client needs and two goals, and states the goals in a SMART format.27.2 to >22.4 ptsPROFICIENTIdentifies two client needs and two goals.22.4 to >0 ptsBASICIdentifies at least one client need and at least one goal.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify at least one client need and at least one goal./ 32 ptsIdentify two objectives for each treatment goal based on the assessment. (C7.GP.A)32 to >27.2 ptsDISTINGUISHEDIdentifies two objectives for each treatment goal based on the assessment, and applies evidence-based research to inform practice interventions.27.2 to >22.4 ptsPROFICIENTIdentifies two objectives for each treatment goal based on the assessment.22.4 to >0 ptsBASICIdentifies at least one objective for each treatment goal based on the assessment.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify at least one objective for each treatment goal based on the assessment./ 32 ptsIdentify at least two community resources to recommend for the family. (C3.GP.A)32 to >27.2 ptsDISTINGUISHEDIdentifies at least two community resources to recommend for the family, and provides a rationale for the resources and links to the resources.27.2 to >22.4 ptsPROFICIENTIdentifies at least two community resources to recommend for the family.22.4 to >0 ptsBASICIdentifies at least one community resource to recommend for the family.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify at least one community resource to recommend for the family./ 32 ptsExplain any foreseen areas of difficulty this family may have in moving forward with the treatment goals. (C6.GP.B)32 to >27.2 ptsDISTINGUISHEDExplains any foreseen areas of difficulty this family may have in moving forward with the treatment goals, and explains how these areas would be managed.27.2 to >22.4 ptsPROFICIENTExplains any foreseen areas of difficulty this family may have in moving forward with the treatment goals.22.4 to >0 ptsBASICIdentifies any foreseen areas of difficulty this family may have in moving forward with the treatment goals.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify any foreseen areas of difficulty this family may have in moving forward with the treatment goals./ 32 ptsApply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions that may arise within this case study. (C1.GP.A)32 to >27.2 ptsDISTINGUISHEDApplies strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions that may arise within this case study, and explains how to tolerate ambiguity when resolving ethical conflicts.27.2 to >22.4 ptsPROFICIENTApplies strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions that may arise within this case study.22.4 to >0 ptsBASICIdentifies strategies of ethical reasoning that would support principled decisions that may arise within this case study.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify strategies of ethical reasoning that would support principled decisions that may arise within this case study./ 32 ptsCommunicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.40 to >34 ptsDISTINGUISHEDCommunicates with exceptional clarity in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.34 to >28 ptsPROFICIENTCommunicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.28 to >0 ptsBASICCommunicates in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not communicate in a manner that is consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession./ 40 pts



^{Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."}